Monday, June 27, 2011

5 Sentences...


Here are 5 sentences that Mr. Obama should read every morning and commit to action.  Indeed, every politician lesser than him should read them also.  Timothy Geithner might want to read them twice a day.

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

English common law has a principle/fable called The Tragedy of the Commons.   Our politicians need to understand it better.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Preserving Public Access to Public Lands...

Here is an inspiring article about a family who has worked hard for 25 years to save public access to a beautiful pass in Colorado.  I traveled over Ophir Pass in 2002 after visiting the Paonia Rally.  High and Rocky, it was relatively easy for me on my R1100GS.
http://www.papatelluride.org/Pauls_Family_Work/COHVCO_May2008_PAPAGlennPauls.pdf

Imagine the dedication and love of the land:  You spend your family's time and money to buy mining claims and lands and then donate it to the Forest Service so that it will forever be open to all recreation.  My hat is off to these people.

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Jon Hunstman Campaign Kickoff Video is Original

Jon Huntsman is a former Utah Governor and recently resigned US Ambassador to China.  He announced for President this week and used the linked video as an opener.  As campaign videos go it is quite unusual, and also quite eyecatching, especially if you ride dirt bikes.
http://vimeo.com/25410215

The interesting thing is that many are unsure whether Hunstman will be a candidate who will support outdoor recreation and public access to public lands or not.  I received the following note and links - you can start to get an idea from them.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Subject: Presidential candidate starts campaign on a dirt bike
Note: this is NOT an endorsement of any kind, but it's amazing that a presidential candidate opens his campaign on a CRF450 in the Utah desert.

It doesn’t matter if you are for or against him; you gotta agreed that viewing a presidential candidate in the vast Utah desert on a motorcycle makes a statement. Be careful and study your candidates. Here is how you can get information regarding supporters of your interests:
Some PAPA members in Utah and Colorado have requested information regarding Jon Huntsman.  Several people in the know say that there are other candidates who will represent your interest much better. I personally do not know. You research and decide.

After reviewing Don Amador’s blog and talking to involved Utah dirt bike guys, I understand that Jon Huntsman does know how to ride a dirt bike and evidently is pretty good on a closed course track. However he didn’t do ANYTHING for us as Governor.  Check out the Trailpartyvotersguide web site and draw your own conclusion.

Here are some more interesting URLs:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

RedBear's take is that Hunstman has made an excellent advertisement and he is a pretty good rider. 

I very much like his father, Jon Huntsman Sr.  If Jr. has as much moxie and conservative principles as Sr., he would be a great candidate.  But, I have a few reservations.  I am starting to feel like he is somewhat of a RINO and a big government eco-nut.  He certainly bears watching to see which way he goes.  The cautions in the note are well spoken.  If Don Amador becomes a supporter, then that is a pretty good sign, since he is part of the soul of the Blue Ribbon Coalition.

Back-country motorcycling is, for me, one of those bellwether, canary-in-the-coal mine types of issues.  Motorized Public lands access is critical for folks who are getting older, but who still want to enjoy the wonders of a Utah desert.  Just like 2nd Amendment freedoms, if a candidate cannot actively support these fundamentals, which should not be party-line divisible, then I cannot support him/her.

I think I will join the Trail Party and renew my Blue Ribbon Coalition membership.  Maybe PAPA too, since I think I’ve ridden some of the areas they want to close.  This latest obsession of the bureaucrats and eco-nuts with turning non-Wilderness back into Wilderness by just changing the name is getting out of hand.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Grandparents can forget about buying kid's bicyles...

In the previous post about HR 412 Kids Just Want to Ride Act, I showed how well-meaning legislation has unintended consequences.  HR 412 will fixed the problem with kid's motorcycles, if it gets passed.

But what about kid's bicycles, bike trailers, trikes, strollers and wagons, etc?  I am not sure but I bet that you will not be allowed to buy these things for kid's in 2012.  I called Mike's Bikes in Walnut Creek - they said only bikes made in China were affected.  From my further research, I think that is wrong. 

Because, the CPSIA Lead Law specifies a very low 100 part-per-million level of lead in all parts.  That includes parts like wheels, spokes, handlebars, grab rails, brake levers, and tire valve cores (brass)...all things where the lead will never be able to leach out and harm kids.  Many metallic alloys made of steel (.35%), aluminum (.4%), copper (4%) contain lead as a normal part of the metal alloy.  Even brass musical instruments are affected.

A must-read summary article:  http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/154333-enough-already-its-time-to-amend-the-lead-law

BTW, the law bans resale of used bikes and toys, also.  Good Will and similar companies that serve the poor have sent thousand of tons of clothing, toys, games, children's books and other items to the trash heaps in the past two years, mostly because they cannot afford to test every item.

http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/cpsia-things-i-learned-at-the-rally/
http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/bicycle-smashup-of-the-regulatory-sort/

Lead Law: Good News Still Outweighed by Bad News on CPSIA Lead Law

We old farts have a responsibility to protect and advocate for the sports we have been fortunate to enjoy, so that future generations can experience the outdoors like we have. 

In 2008 ago the CPSIA (Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act) declared that children toys with certain, very low, levels of lead should be banned from sale and that products should be tested regularly to ensure compliance.  This was mainly in response to toys from China and Mexico that small kids might put in their mouths and ingest lead from.

Unfortunately, the law was too broadly written and the CPSC (Consumer Products Safety Commission) bureaucrats claim they had no choice but to ban products like small motorcycles that are specifically sized for kids under 12.  The small sized bikes fit kids better and are thus safer.  But like all motorcycles they have lead in the battery terminals and small amounts of lead in wheel rims and other metal parts.  Now, obviously, motorcycling kids are not going to be licking their handlebars or taste-testing their batteries.  The upshot is that many motorcycles were not sold in 2009 and 2010 to the safety detriment of many kids who needed new or used bikes to continue their riding and racing.  The economic impact on dealers was very large because some derive about 1/3 of their sales from small bikes.

Last year the CPSC agreed to stay the enforcement of CPSIA until the end of 2011, pending new legislation.  Of course, that legislation hasn't happened yet.  Unless changed, 2012 will see a ban on childrens' motorcycles, ATVs, bicycles, etc.

The good news is that Rep. Denny Rehberg of Montana has inserted language in a 2012 Services bill to block the CPSIA as concerns motorcycles.  But this is a temporay measure.  "While I'm working on a permanent fix to get rid of this dangerous regulation, my appropriations language will buy more time," he said. Rehberg was referring to H.R. 412, the Kids Just Want to Ride Act, which he introduced to exempt kids' OHVs from the lead-content restrictions of the CPSIA."

The bad news is that what really needs to happen is to pass Rehbergs's Kids Just Want to Ride Act, HR 412.  AMA held a large rally on May 26 called the AMA Family Capital Hill Climb and many youngsters spoke about their riding and implored Congress to act.  http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/KidsJustWantToRide.aspx

Please call your representatives and tell them to vote for HR412 and to pass the appropriations amendment.  See here:
http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/NewsView/11-06-17/Federal_funding_language_would_block_lead_law_enforcement.aspx
and:
http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/rights/issueslegislation

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Why do we ride in the Western States?

Because they are dry!  Well, okay, we enjoy a water crossing occasionally for something different to do, or to wash the mud off.

But some guys must take what they are dealt:  http://vimeo.com/24412525

All rain, all they time, and still these guys had a great weekend....

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

What can a little guy do about the Debt?????

Such a big question was posed to me a while ago, thusly (paraphrased):
-------------------------
This video outlines the debt problems of our government and is well worth watching...not long and very startling information. http://www.youtube.com/embed/VtVbUmcQSuk

Do you really believe that the ‘advocacy’ groups are really going to change the government policies and reduce the debt? Are they going to get complacent citizens involved? I don’t think so.

Whether the people realize it or not, we are becoming a socialist state, controlled by the government. I believe that when the countries like the U.S. cannot pay their debt there will be a world crisis, but only the first stage will be finance & money. More importantly, I believe the looming crisis is really between the “haves” and the “have nots” and the fight will be over the availability of natural resources (air, water, land). Will we be dead by then?

Each of us has only 20-40 years left. What do we do to protect our financial security for the next 30+ years?  How are you helping your children to understand this issue?
-----------------------
I responded with this little essay:

The video is only a teaser.  Reality is worse. 

By this 3rd year point in all recoveries history shows strong employment and GDP rising at 6+%.  This time employment is stagnant or getting worse and GDP growth is 1.8%.  Three years of government spending has not worked.  The news is full of the words “double-dip recession” and “stagnation” or “stagflation.”  We’ll have to wait to see if this proves out, but the chances are strong that is what is happening.

How do we prevent this from getting worse? 

First, vote out Obama and his henchmen.  They have an social/economic agenda that doesn’t include balanced budgets or reducing debt.

Second:  Write your senators and congressmen and tell them to stop spending.  Tell them to reform Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.  Tell them to return to the original constitutional divisions of State powers and Federal powers.  For instance, Paul Ryan’s plan may not be perfect but it is at least a place to start talking.  Obama and crew have no real proposals yet and none in sight.

Third:  To understand what is happening, read the Wall Street Journal editorial pages to see a consistent, fact based, rational economic approach to government, law and economy.

Fourth:  Move to Canada.  Okay, not too realistic, except for me.  And Canada’s medical system is crashing, although its economy is pretty strong.

I do not agree that the battle is between “haves” and “have-nots” like so many in the liberal media and liberal government want you to believe.  I believe the battle is between liberal central-control economic and laissez-faire moral policies that strive to build a nanny state to coddle everyone and thus grow the voting base of progressives; and a system based on freedom of personal action and the Constitution’s federal framework that builds a more morally, economically and politically conservative nation which lives within its means.  

I only partially agree with the battle over air, water, land.  California is a rich state.  Because of that, over the past 30 years it has managed to reduce air pollution immensely and reduce auto tailpipe emissions by 99%.  But only a rich state can do that.  Poor states are still striving to eat each day.  Natural resources will always be there.  We will find new sources and recycle used materials, and find new technologies.  The former will give way to the recycling when the costs are advantageous.  For instance, we are actually building new water storage reservoirs, finally, in California.  You can’t see some of them because they are underground.  Coincidentally, new technologies that water lawns based on cell phone signals from real-time precipitation monitoring can cut water use by 30%.  Energy is the biggest resource we must figure out.  Energy makes countries rich.  There is lots of energy.  What is needed is a comprehensive and economically sensible energy policy, which no US Administration has been able to accomplish for 50 years.

Today’s government seems to believe that it knows best for all occasions and all subjects.  That is the road to perdition.  Mitt Romney just said in Stratham, NH.:  “Who is it who rules America?  You do, every four years.”  Take that to heart and act.

I read a great book lately:  “it happened on the way to war” by Rye Barcroft (http://cfk.unc.edu/ ) .  It’s central theme is that even the most disadvantaged people (in this case people in the worst slum in Nairobi, Kenya) can succeed if given a little opportunity to do it themselves.  The same is true for all if they want it.

What can you do for your children?  Recognize that “Youth aren’t the future leaders.  They’re the present and future leaders.”  Teach them basic principles – math science, humanities, reading writing, Constitution, humility, hard work, money management.  Do it directly and especially by example.  Then let them go.

 

David Brooks had a good article in the CCTimes yesterday. Called, “Harsh reality for new college grads: It's not all about you.”  His basic message was that success in life is more about hard work than about realizing dreams.  http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_18176146?IADID=Search-www.contracostatimes.com-www.contracostatimes.com&nclick_check=1