Hillary's Crimes #1005

Michael Mukasey, the US Attorney General from 2007-2009, produced an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Jan 22, 2016 about Hillary's email mess.  The title is "Clinton's Emails: A Criminal Charge is Justified."

Mukasey discusses the email scandal and concludes that Hillary knew enough about the material she handled to support a conviction for at least mishandling classified information.  That is the charge brought against General Petraeus.

Further, he suggests that more severe grades of bad acts may apply and attract a criminal charge: 

• Knowledge of what she was doing regarding mishandling classified information relating to national defense
• Gross negligence in the case of mishandling classified information relating to national defense
• Bad intent relating to actual or attempted destruction of email messages
• Corrupt intent relating to State Department business

He finishes by saying, " our public officials will do their job."

Crime # 1005:  Mukasey also mentions recent reporting by Catherine Herridge at Fox, where she says the FBI are now looking at "the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed."

Hillary's Crimes #1003 and #1004

Continuing the miserable story of Hillary and her criminal email servers and mail forwarding.

#1003:  It is becoming more and more clear that Hillary transmitted top Confidential, Secret and Top Secret documents.  Many of them appear to have had the classification designations removed by her staff, who are thus also complicit.  In one discovered email. she instructs a staffer to convert from paper to "paperless" and send in the clear.

The FBI now says about 3000 emails are in this situation.  In addition, there are some 24 document that were in the four categories of Top Secret, including some in the SAP (Secure Access Programs) level of Top Secret.  These are documents that have information and often names of foreign operations and operatives and informers.

Yesterday, several generals were interviewed on TV and they were furious that she had not already been charged.  They also said it is 80% probable the SAP information is now in the hands of Iran and North Korea.  They claim Hillary's actions are much worse than what Edward Snowden did.

And what does Hillary say to all of this?  She is dismissive that it is a Republican plot and nothing bad happened.  She says that nothing marked "Classified" was transmitted.  This is a prevarication:  nothing is ever marked "Classified."

For instance, Top Secret information is that "...reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security..."

Classifications:  Wikipedia: Classified_information_in_the_United_States
Executive Order 13526:  Executive_Order_13526   Read Sec. 4.3 about Special Access Programs.

#1004:  Hillary will ruin careers if her transgressions are not moved forward.  There are about 100 to 150 FBI employees working on the Clinton Email Scandal.  The leaks and rumors are that there is more than enough evidence to indict Hillary.  Further, if the FBI Director James Comey does not recommend indictments, these staff people are angry enough to resign.  If he recommends and  Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not levee charges, the reaction will be widespread and nasty.

Conservative Principles per Bill Whiittle

Bill Whittle sums up the conservative view of life quite nicely in this short video:  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjGsLmAXTYs

Bill as the Virtual President on Gun Control: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5ELyG9V1SY

Hillary's Crimes #1001 and 1002

There are so many Hillary crimes that I just arbitrarily started at 1000.  Close enough for government work.

1001:  So, this week we  learned that she had previously told the FBI that she started using her home email server for her personal email in March of 2009.  But now we find out the FBI has recovered emails to Gen. Petraeus that occurred before then.  Just another in the long line of Hillary perjuries...ah...what difference does it make!

1002:  Today Bill and Hill gave an interview about the email scandal on TV (Meet the Press?).  As I heard it, their campaign manager tweeted that the whole matter is now settled, or words to that effect.  At almost the same time, a manager in the Hillary Super PAC also tweeted the same message to her folks.  Same words, same commas! Sounds like coordination of at least cut and pasting a message sent to both.  So sad for them, that kind of coordination is a crime.  Campaigns and PACS cannot coordinate,  or plan together or even coomunicate.  (Think they'll get busted?  Nah, because the laws for ordinary people don't apply to her highness Hillary.)

Hillary's Email Scandal 3 - Or Should I Say Crime?

Here is an  interesting discussion with a former Federal Marshall about Hilliary's emails.  See video embedded in this Breitbart report about Hillary staff in Nevada conducting suspicious campaign voter registration actions, which Nevada's Attorney General in now investigating.

james-okeefe-video-hillary-campaign-workers-run-questions-election-law-violations/

Hillary's Email Scandal 2 - Staffers Participate in Email Coverup

How did Hillary actually set up an email server in her home?  Well, first she used the IT guy that was assigned as her tame computer expert.  Then she used her staff to manage her emails.

So, did all of these people know that they were doing something wrong and contrary to Federal Code (including 18USC798) and State Department rules?  Of course they did.  But, you don't disagree with Hillary and risk facing her mean and vindictive anger.  And, as far as I have seen, none of her staff held sufficient security clearances to handle her mail.

First:  More proof of criminal intent:  clinton-asked-diplomat-to-send-classified-intel-to-my-personal-email

IT Guy: Bryan Pagliano.  His State Dept. job was to be Hillary's IT expert.  He worked as her IT director during her 2008 campaign.  Then he was hired by State in May 2009 as special projects manager to the Chief Tech Officer.  He had responsibility for setup and maintenance of her personal servers.  The proof that he knew about the impropriety is that he has now invoked his 5th Amendment right to not self-incriminate himself after being subpoenaed by Trey Gowdy's House Select Committee on Benghazi.  In addition, he did not report on his taxes or ethics forms about the income.  He left this job when she finished as Secretary.  See here:  Former-staffer-who-maintained-hillary-clintons-private-email-server-to-plead-the-fifth

Staffer 1:  Huma Mahmood Abedin, wife of Anthony Wiener.  Close confidant.  Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton as a special government employee." At the same time, she was a consultant at the Teneo consulting firm and a paid consultant for the Clinton Foundation.  Can you say " Multiple allegiances?"  See Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

Staffer 2:  Cheryl Mills - She helped to delete emails from the infamous 70,000.  No sufficient security clearance?  See here:  aides-hillary-clinton-testify-benghazi   She gave nine hours of closed testimony on September 3, 2015.

Lawyer:  David Kendall has known both Clintons since their days at Yale.  He defended Bill during his impeachment hearings.  Kendall is known to have held, in a safe delivered by the State Dept, thumb drive(s) containing copies of Hillary's email server data.  Kendall similarly does not hold sufficient security clearance to have these in his possession.

So, how many people are potentially in trouble for handling, modifying, passing on sensitive emails?  At the least we have Pagliano, Mills, Abedin, and Hillary's lawyer.  There must be many others in State and other groups.   Someone removed the "Secret" banners from several emails (felony).  Many must have selected emails for Hillary to manage the flow of traffic (misdemeanor or felony depending on classification).  Several at State obviously knew she had the personal servers and didn't report the offenses (felonies?).  And on and on...

See here:  Hillary-clintons-aides-could-face-prosecution-for-mishandling-classified-material

EPA Tryanny in Wyoming

Andy Johnson is a small farmer/rancher who works as a welder to raise his family of six.  He built a stock pond a few years ago, after obtainingall needed local and state permits.  These permits were signed off by the correct agencies when the pond was completed.

Two years later EPA charged him with an illegal construction in a wetland.  They have been fining him at least $37,500 per day ever since.  The total is now over $16 million.

Watch this video to see the injustice and to see the beautiful little pond that has enhanced the local environment on Andy's property and neighborhood.

Andy Johnson Stock Pond in Wyoming - PLF video

Thankfully, Pacific Legal Foundation and many legislators have come to Andy's assistance.  However, EPA still maintains that Andy has violated teh Clean Water Act, especially now that they have declared jurisdiction of all of the "Waters of the U.S."

The scary part is that if the EPA prevails on its "Waters of the U.S." declaration, they will have destroyed private property rights for all Americans who have any type of water on their property.  Significantly, the White House supports and encourages this bureaucratic tyranny.

See PLF page here:  Pacificlegal.org/Cases/Case-johnson

RedBear encourages donations to PLF for the good work they do for freedom.

Similar story:  Mike and Chantall Sackett fought the EPA and after about 6 years finally won in the Supreme Court.  The court said things like "egregious overreach" about the EPA.  The decision was 9-0.  See here:  Sackett Case against EPA